-
Website
http://eaves.ca/ -
Original page
http://eaves.ca/2009/09/24/how-bloggers-can-keep-the-internet-healthy/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Devin Johnston
4 comments · 4 points
-
Harley Young
26 comments · 1 points
-
Stephen Taylor
6 comments · 54 points
-
Facebook User
4 comments · 1 points
-
nickcharney
5 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
A Sad Day for Canadian Democracy
1 week ago · 19 comments
-
Eaves.ca Blogging Moment #7 (2009 Edition): Explaining the New to the Old
3 days ago · 3 comments
-
The Supreme Court of Canada: There are no journalists, only citizens
2 weeks ago · 11 comments
-
MuniForge: Creating municipalities that work like the web
1 month ago · 9 comments
-
Why David Suzuki Matters
3 weeks ago · 7 comments
-
A Sad Day for Canadian Democracy
It's a great idea, and all the heavy lifting has already been done: http://code.google.com/p/ie6-upgrade-warning/
Someone would just need to package it up as an add-on product for the various blogging platforms so that people don't have to have even the add-one-line-of-code-to-your-template skill to install it.
I think the real barrier to killing IE6 is the fact that many large enterprises have unfortunately built custom internal apps targeting IE6 and don't have the capacity to upgrade their apps to work with a modern, standards-compliant browser. But I don't have any data to prove this. It would be interesting to do some research to quantify the reasons why people who are using IE6 still are using it.
Also of note: Firefox still doesn't have official, supported enterprise-scale deployment & management tools, although I know this has long been "in the pipeline." I can only assume Mozilla has some internal market research that justifies keeping this as a relatively low priority.
Also, in Mozilla's defence they are also aware that many users are in entreprises which is why they built this website.
Indeed, maybe the widget Jon is referencing could be edited to include a link to that site...
I like Mozilla's approach -- i.e., talk to your IT department and let them know you're in favour of upgrading your browser -- and it's also important to recognize that the IT department is not the only barrier. As cuz84d suggests, there are lots of vendors who write code that's IE6-specific. So I think IT needs to know that they have people who not only support an upgrade, but will have *their* backs when they go to management and suggest that a browser upgrade is important enough to merit re-evaluating their relationships with the vendors who won't support modern browsers.
In other words, this isn't just an IT issue; it's also a siloing issue, and at large organizations it will often require real leadership and teamwork across departments.
I think part of what we can do as people who care about web standards, security, and platform independence is to provide ammunition for the evangelists within organizations -- just as Mozilla has done, although I would argue that the ammunition includes making a business case that will convince management to *listen* to the recommendations from IT.
[Edited to add: The other place we see a lot of IE6 is in the developing world, where the computers themselves are often much older, and internet connections are less than great. In many cases, people are unlikely to upgrade browsers because even the download process is a time & bandwidth hog, in a context where hard drive space and connectivity are scarce.]
Everyone from the small business to the enterprise with mission critical apps believes if it ain't broke don't fix it, nor will they upgrade if it isn't the same or doesn't work right or like the other software their using. ie like IE6. They need to control things, and somethings are so mission critical they will not change whats working or update it just because some blogger says IE8 just came out or FF. . you got to fix the product first, and well printing in FF is not IE quality to start with.
However, in the mean time, enterprises can keep using IE6 for their mission critical webapps and also have Firefox (or other modern browser) for general internet usage.
It's not exactly what I had in mind (I was thinking of something that went on your sidebar), but this is also very cool. Thank you for finding it! And kudos to the author!
The first task would be to find the major reasons for not switching. Here the bloggers could help by identifying IE6 users.
- If an IE6-user comes to a blog, and a company can be identified, e.g. from the IP-address or the user agent, that company might be contacted in a coordinated, constructive manner to figure out why they have not switched.
- If the IE6-user leaves a email-address, e.g. with comment, that user might be contacted personally (no spam).
- If a IE6-user comes to the site he/she might be given a survey (in a friendly tone, not a nag screen) to figure out why they have not upgraded, or they might be dropped diretly into a chat with a real living person.
Some interesting statistics might be, if most IE6 users are from companies (and if so which). If they are from specific countries, and if so, which. Or are all the IE6-users really just spam address harvesters made to look like real users as to not be detected?
The second phase would be to address the major reasons for not switching found from the research (leaving the guess work and superstitions behind). It would probably again require mobilizing a lot of people to contact local businesses and helping them with their pain points or just making them aware. It might also require making an official mozilla msi-package part of the normal release process.
The plug in I just installed could probably be (relatively easily) modified to do just what you are talking about.
Also, just to be clear (and defend the original plug-in designer) the plugin above (and the one I hypothesized) does not focus on Firefox, it provides links to Chrome, FF, IE8, and a few others.
See http://theunfocused.net/2009/05/24/a-good-and-s...
Second, for those stuck using IE 6 (or any closed browser) by fiat - there is the Google Chrome frame. http://code.google.com/chrome/chromeframe/ it's experimental at the moment, but it points toward a possible solution to the rendering engine issues.