<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>eaves.ca - Latest Comments in Re: The Daily Show, Post-Bush</title><link>http://eavesca.disqus.com/</link><description>On public policy, open source, negotiation and Canada</description><atom:link href="https://eavesca.disqus.com/re_the_daily_show_post_bush/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:22:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Re: The Daily Show, Post-Bush</title><link>http://eaves.ca/2008/11/10/re-the-daily-show-post-bush/#comment-3662417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Something that has been floating in the back of my head to!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree with you. Well said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think he can have even more fun with extra correspondents.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chris finlay</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:22:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Re: The Daily Show, Post-Bush</title><link>http://eaves.ca/2008/11/10/re-the-daily-show-post-bush/#comment-3661694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know, I'd done some wondering myself, but I think you've nailed this one.  The media is the real target, and the humor will keep flowing.  What may lag (at least in the short-term) is viewer interest, at least until they realize that The Daily Show is still funny.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maplestar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:11:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>